Sandbox
Probando
<R output="html" iframe="width:100%;height:250px;"> prob=0.15; nmin=1; nmax=15; x=6 m <-pbinom(rep(0:x, each = nmax-nmin+1), rep(nmin:nmax,x), prob) dim(m) <- c(nmax-nmin+1,x+1) m <- t(m) colnames(m) <- format(nmin:nmax) rownames(m) <- format(0:x) outHTML(rhtml, m, title="x\n", format="f", digits=4) </R>
<R output="display" iframe="width:400px;height:400px"> pdf(rpdf, width=5, height=5) n <- 10 prob <- 0.2 x <- seq(0, n, 1) p <- dbinom(x, n, prob) param <- list(n, prob) main <- c("Binomialverteilung - Wahrscheinlichkeitsfunktion", paste (c("Stichprobenumfang n", "Wahrscheinlichkeit p"), param, sep="=")) plot(x,p, type="h", main=main) </R>
<R>1:20</R>
hola [1]
- Shaner NC, Campbell RE, Steinbach PA, Giepmans BN, Palmer AE, and Tsien RY. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Dec;22(12):1567-72. DOI:10.1038/nbt1037 |
- Ubhayasekera W, Muñoz IG, Vasella A, Ståhlberg J, and Mowbray SL. Structures of Phanerochaete chrysosporium Cel7D in complex with product and inhibitors. FEBS J. 2005 Apr;272(8):1952-64. DOI:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04625.x |
-
Casajuana J, Aragonès R, Ariza F. Significado clínico de un PSA elevado FMC 2004;11(10) 604-13.
- Etzioni RD, Ankerst DP, Weiss NS, Inoue LY, and Thompson IM. Is prostate-specific antigen velocity useful in early detection of prostate cancer? A critical appraisal of the evidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Oct 17;99(20):1510-5. DOI:10.1093/jnci/djm171 |
- Ilic D, O'Connor D, Green S, and Wilt T. Screening for prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD004720. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004720.pub2 |
- Boyd SD and Narayan P. Management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. West J Med. 1994 Feb;160(2):165-6.
- Hoogendam A, Buntinx F, and de Vet HC. The diagnostic value of digital rectal examination in primary care screening for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Fam Pract. 1999 Dec;16(6):621-6. DOI:10.1093/fampra/16.6.621 |
- Bereczky Z, Bolus M, Chetty P, du Toit W, Enslin J, Haffejee M, Heyns C, Hyams D, Kirstein D, Mackenzie M, Mamine A, Mutambirwa S, Niemand B, Opperman C, Pontin A, Reif S, Sauer F, Segone A, Smart D, Steenkamp P, Stellmacher G, van Wijk F, Wentzel S, and South African Urological Association. Management of benign prostatic hyperplasia - South African Urological Association Guideline. S Afr Med J. 2006 Dec;96(12 Pt 3):1275-9.
- Rosenberg MT, Staskin DR, Kaplan SA, MacDiarmid SA, Newman DK, and Ohl DA. A practical guide to the evaluation and treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms in the primary care setting. Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Sep;61(9):1535-46. DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01491.x |
- Algaba F, Trias I, and Arce Y. Natural history of prostatic carcinoma: the pathologist's perspective. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2007;175:9-24. DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-40901-4_2 |
- Okotie OT, Roehl KA, Han M, Loeb S, Gashti SN, and Catalona WJ. Characteristics of prostate cancer detected by digital rectal examination only. Urology. 2007 Dec;70(6):1117-20. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.019 |
- Webber R. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Clin Evid. 2006 Jun(15):1213-26.
- Wilt T. Prostate cancer (non-metastatic). Clin Evid. 2003 Dec(10):1023-38.
- Marzo Castillejo M, Cierco Peguera P, and Bonfill Cosp X. [Prostate cancer screening]. Aten Primaria. 2001 Oct 31;28(7):468-71. DOI:10.1016/s0212-6567(01)70423-4 |
- Roobol MJ, Kranse R, de Koning HJ, and Schröder FH. Prostate-specific antigen velocity at low prostate-specific antigen levels as screening tool for prostate cancer: results of second screening round of ERSPC (ROTTERDAM). Urology. 2004 Feb;63(2):309-13; discussion 313-5. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.083 |
- Yamamoto T, Ito K, Ohi M, Kubota Y, Suzuki K, Fukabori Y, Kurokawa K, and Yamanaka H. Diagnostic significance of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4 NG/ML or less. Urology. 2001 Dec;58(6):994-8. DOI:10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01409-1 |
- Ilic D and Green S. Screening for prostate cancer in younger men. BMJ. 2007 Dec 1;335(7630):1105-6. DOI:10.1136/bmj.39385.491424.80 |
- Lin KW and Duane MR. Are some screening tests doing more harm than good?. Am Fam Physician. 2007 Aug 1;76(3):351-2.
- Irwig L, McCaffery K, Salkeld G, and Bossuyt P. Informed choice for screening: implications for evaluation. BMJ. 2006 May 13;332(7550):1148-50. DOI:10.1136/bmj.332.7550.1148 |
- Edwards A, Unigwe S, Elwyn G, and Hood K. Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review. BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):703-9. DOI:10.1136/bmj.327.7417.703 |
- 2003afp pmid=12613733
- 2002cmaj pmid=12197692
- 2004aim pmid=15126260
- 2006clch pmid=16762996
- 2004ccc pmid=15090718
- 2007nejm pmid=18160689
- 2008bju pmid=17760888
- 2007jncc pmid=17692178
- 2007bju pmid=17594349
- 2007cmaj pmid=17576986
- 2007ju1 pmid=17509297
- 2007afp pmid=17492070
- 2007ju pmid=17499293
- 2007clt pmid=17292541
- 2007mcp pmid=17290734
- 2006aeu1 pmid=17283721
- 2007cl pmid=17258389
- 2007p pmid=17143882
- 2007bjui pmid=17550409
- 2007urol pmid=17382151
- 2005wimj pmid=15999885
- 2004bju pmid=14678366
- 2002can pmid=12365027
- NICE1 Guidance for ...Outcomes in Urological The Research Evidence NICE
- 2006oncol pmid=16601365
- 2006bju pmid=16566811
- 2002cpc pmid=15046699
- 2003jafp pmid=12665174
- 2002ptt pmid=12111706
- 2000jgim pmid=11089718
- 2006urol pmid=16600352
- 2006ui pmid=16401916
- 2006upur pmid=16504254
- cocaid pmid=12804407
- 2006ijcp pmid=17109668
- tramf tacto rectal amf
- cks hbp